Discussion:
Me-264
(too old to reply)
Rob Arndt
2010-05-12 11:14:27 UTC
Permalink
Loading Image...

Rob
David E. Powell
2010-05-13 19:42:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob Arndt
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a174/Tireur/amerikabomber_01.jpg
Rob
More links on this aircraft here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Me_264

From Wikipedia:

The Messerschmitt Me 264 Amerika was a long-range maritime
reconnaissance aircraft developed during World War II for the German
Luftwaffe. It was intended to support U-boat operations far into the
Atlantic, serving both as a scout to direct the attack, as well as
launching attacks of its own. The design was later selected as a
competitor in the Reichsluftfahrtministerium's (the German Air
Ministry) "Amerika Bomber" programme, which intended to develop a
strategic bomber capable of attacking New York City from bases in
France or the Azores, although it is highly doubtful that this would
have been achieved with a meaningful payload, if at all. Three
prototypes were built, but production was abandoned to allow
Messerschmitt to concentrate on fighter production while another
design, the Junkers Ju 390, had been selected in its place as a
maritime reconnaissance plane.


http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread8617/pg1

Looks like it was a reverse of the B-24 "Bomber to reconnaissance
plane" progression. It looks like a follow on to the FW-200 Condor in
a more purpose built platform, Wiki has a picture of one dated August
1942. Another potential "Ural Bomber."

Ironic, the nose looks B-29esque but the wing and gear remind me a bit
of the B-24 Liberator.
Keith Willshaw
2010-05-13 20:21:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by David E. Powell
Post by Rob Arndt
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a174/Tireur/amerikabomber_01.jpg
Rob
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Me_264
The idea of operating from the Azores is interesting but I suspect the
fighters at RAF Lagens (now Lajes Field) might have posed a problem :)

Note the actual performance of the aircraft seems to have been rather
less than was promised.

Keith
Rob Arndt
2010-05-14 01:06:47 UTC
Permalink
Thank you David for that practically useless information on the Me-264
history.

As "Amerika Bomber" that would have been the Me-264B model that was
never built- you know, the 6-engine version which later evolved into
the Me-264/6m... aka, Me-364.. So let's compare Wiki to the facts:

The Me-264 from inception* was to be part of the America Mission that
was under Udet until his suicide in Nov 1941 which put Milch in
charge, afterwhich the first conference on the America Mission was
brought up in Feb 1942. It was Flugbaumeister Freibel (the air staff
engineer responsible for a/c development) that had stated that NONE of
the machines under development would have the capability of carrying
out that mission w/o development of air-to-air refueling. That
included the Me-264 which at that time was hampered by workshop limits
and transferred temporarily to Dornier where problems persisted. Then
joined Weserflug which wanted to transfer management of the project to
S Germany and that was rebuked. Thus, the Me-264 as bomber was running
way behind schedule in 1942.

In April 1942 Milch therefore ordered a complete evaluation of all
long-distance bomber aircraft projects (gee David the Me-264 was at
this point still a bomber project with nothing to do with convoy
protection, aka Condor work). On April 24th Oberstleutnant Edgar
Petersen, head of the Rechlin a/c test center went to Messerschmitt,
Augsburg to document and confirm that the Me-264 prototype was 90%
complete. The same day Messerschmitt himself presented his personal
study on Atlantic Operations and suggested (key-word) that the Me-264
also have a secondary purpose of spying on Allied convoys and be used
as a maritime AS platform using modern bombs and missiles under
development. Messerschmitt also issued a report that a 45 ton Me-264
would have a range of 13,000 km if fitted with 4x Jumo 211J engines or
14,000 km with 4x BMW 801 radials. The V-1 was looking good for a
first flight in Sept 42 followed by the V-2 and V-3 by winter.

The RLM embraced Messerschmitt's projections because nuisance raids on
American cities would be of high propaganda value and morale boosters
to the German people. So Messerschmitt was allowed to step up the pace
of develoment accordingly. However, the Fw-200 Condor and the He-177
also remained on a list of a/c that could be modified for longer-
ranges to hit the US which was part of Udet's original proposal before
his suicide. The minimum requirement was 12,000 km (the distance from
Brest to NY and return). 3000 km was added as fuel and technical
reserves with a minimum of 3.5 ton bomb load plus normal armor and
defensive armament. But Fw and Junkers (which had a proposal as well)
could not keep the weights down and proposed huge 100+ ton bombers
which would need future engines that were not yet in production. Even
if the DB 603 X 6 were available, it would take 2 years of developemnt
to fly the first a/c and that didn't happen.

Messerschmitt was dealt another blow when it was discovered that his
projections would not be adequate to reach America and return- that he
hadn't the necessary reserves to return and in-flight German re-
fueling was not being developed to that degree (two a/c take-off to
the 3000 km point and then one refuels the other and turns back to
France). So then Messerschmitt was ordered to lighten up the a/c with
a generic version submitted by the RLM technical center. This would
feature a normal non-presurized cockpit, proven engines in production,
and no bomb-aimer's position. It was thought that these measures would
allow under-capacity Messerschmitt to proceed faster and avoid
cancellation of the a/c altogether.

Meanwhile two other a/c were being considered for the job- the Bv-238
and Ju-390 derived from the 290.

In response, Messerschmitt now had to plan for development of a 6-
engine version of the Me-264 which could meet the demand for 15,000 km
range, 5 ton bombload, and 4 tons of added armament and armor! But due
to a 2 km run for t/o this version would have to use a jettisonable
undercarriage to get into the air. The heavier a/c was eliminated for
the AS role as it could not dive bomb, but would also have to hit NY
at night as horizontal bomber. Defensive armament also became a
problem, so then the idea of using parasite a/c smaller than a Me Bf
109 came into the studies.

This in turn led to a complete re-evaulation of trans-Atlantic long-
range bombers:

1. The 4-engined Me-264 will proceed with the fastest possible
solution for operations against the US.

2. The necessary mid-air refueling procedure will probably be worked
out in 1942.

3. For distances up to 10000 km, the Ju-390 is best (heavier loads,
better armament, parasite fighters).

4. Investigations with the object of achieving a return to and from
America without refueling (6-engined Me-264) will be stepped up.

5. Use of the Ju-290 for distances up to 8000 km will be investigated
with a view to using the aircraft to refuel the 4-engine Me-264.

At this point we end-up with an endless cycle of revisions, more
competitors, Goering's ignorance of the entire Trans-Atlantic
missions, no air tankers developed from the Ju-290, and Doenitz's
influence with regard to protecting his U-boats in the N Atlantic,
which proposed using the Me-264 for unarmed recon or back to AS with
bombs and missiles. The parasite question also lingered on with
development of the Me-328 with multiple proposals that severely
complicated the entire Amerika Bomber program to the point of
uselessness in the critical 1942-44 timeframe.

The Me-264 itself was late and when evaluated by Baur was loaded with
a multitude of technical problems and aerodynamic problems (stability
and tail flutter). The only real solution for t/o was to use 6x RATO
units to reduce t/o length from 2.4 km down to 1.2 and to substitute
remote-controlled weapons for defense. And yet Messerschmitt and
Dornier combined could never have met the target production required
of at least 30-40 bombers a month, not even back in 1942 before the
entire German aviation industry was under round-the-clock bombing.
Messerschmitt could only attempt 6/mo max and so support for the a/c
began to wane.

With the first Me-264 completed and flown by Dec 23, 1942 and again in
March 1943 serious problems arose with the undercarriage. The unarmed
V-2 was also completed, but bombed in 1944 as was the transferred V-1
(with radial engines fitted) on April 16, 1944; thus, the Me-264
program came to an end, only to have the SS completely revise the
Amerika Bomber program in 1945 to hit NY with a single Wunderwaffe.
Under construction for the task were the He-274, Ju-488, and Ho XVIII
as well as Peenemunde's rocket craft from EMW, Sanger's study of the
Silbervogel still in progress at Lofer, Austria and a ton of projekt a/
c that in no way could be completed before May 1945. Aircraft also
considered were the Bv-222 and He-277 with Ju-390 diverted over to KG
200 and SS evacuation work.

Sources:
1) Luftwaffe Over America, Manfried Griehl, 2004, ISBN 0-7607-8697-6
2) Bombers of the Luftwaffe, Joachim Dressel and Manfried Griehl,
1994, ISBN 1-85409-140-9

I could have also used:

3) Luftwaffe Secret Projects: Strategic Bombers 1935-1945, Dieter
Herwig and Heinz Rode, pgs 41-44, 2000, ISBN 1-85780-092-3

This would include the jet versions powered by 6x Jumo 018s or 028
turboprops and also looks at pusher configurations as well as the
Me-364.

* The Me-264 originated in March 1941 before the US was even in the
war but was still considered for a "nuisance bomber". Why do oyu think
it had a bomb bay to carry up to 5 tons of bombs? Or did you think
that was for leaflets???

You would think that David would have known that :)

Rob
David E. Powell
2010-05-14 04:37:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob Arndt
Thank you David for that practically useless information on the Me-264
history.
Well, it was a bit more info than just a picture, and if anyone was
interested in the plane, a nice place to start.
Post by Rob Arndt
As "Amerika Bomber" that would have been the Me-264B model that was
never built- you know, the 6-engine version which later evolved into
In my opinion a plane to hit factories beyond the Urals would be more
useful to Germany in 1942.
Dan
2010-05-14 05:04:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by David E. Powell
Post by Rob Arndt
Thank you David for that practically useless information on the Me-264
history.
Well, it was a bit more info than just a picture, and if anyone was
interested in the plane, a nice place to start.
Post by Rob Arndt
As "Amerika Bomber" that would have been the Me-264B model that was
never built- you know, the 6-engine version which later evolved into
In my opinion a plane to hit factories beyond the Urals would be more
useful to Germany in 1942.
That would be more true in 1941 before the U.S. started war
production. In any event the Nazi boneheads that planned Barbarossa
seemed to not have a clue how big the Soviet Union was. The Soviets had
some of their factories operating east of the Urals before they even had
roofs. I guess no one told them about natural German superiority.

I wonder if the Nazis could have produced enough heavy bombers to do
the job anyway. Producing fighters was a big enough stress on raw
materials as it was.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Rob Arndt
2010-05-14 06:05:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by David E. Powell
Post by Rob Arndt
Thank you David for that practically useless information on the Me-264
history.
Well, it was a bit more info than just a picture, and if anyone was
interested in the plane, a nice place to start.
Post by Rob Arndt
As "Amerika Bomber" that would have been the Me-264B model that was
never built- you know, the 6-engine version which later evolved into
In my opinion a plane to hit factories beyond the Urals would be more
useful to Germany in 1942.
� �That would be more true in 1941 before the U.S. started war
production. In any event the Nazi boneheads that planned Barbarossa
seemed to not have a clue how big the Soviet Union was. The Soviets had
some of their factories operating east of the Urals before they even had
roofs. I guess no one told them about natural German superiority.
� �I wonder if the Nazis could have produced enough heavy bombers to do
the job anyway. Producing fighters was a big enough stress on raw
materials as it was.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Out of over 120,000 a/c built, the Germans produced roughly 29,000
bombers:

535 Do-17Z
870 Ju-86
1076 Ju-188
1169 He-177
1905 Do-217
7450 He-111
14980 Ju-88 (second only to the B-24 in WW2)
= 27985

Lesser bombers:

Ar-234 230
Do-19 2
Do-23 210
Do-215 101
Do-317 3
Fw-200 276
He-274 2
He-277: 3
Ju-89 2
Ju-287 2
Ju-288 22
Ju-388 20
Ju-488 2

= 875

Grand total= 28,860

Rand McNally Encyclopedia of Military Aircraft

Without the V-Waffen programs there could easily have been built a few
more tens of thousands of bombers. More likely jet fighters though,
given the circumstances from 1943-forward.

Rob
Dan
2010-05-14 06:33:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob Arndt
Post by David E. Powell
Post by Rob Arndt
Thank you David for that practically useless information on the Me-264
history.
Well, it was a bit more info than just a picture, and if anyone was
interested in the plane, a nice place to start.
Post by Rob Arndt
As "Amerika Bomber" that would have been the Me-264B model that was
never built- you know, the 6-engine version which later evolved into
In my opinion a plane to hit factories beyond the Urals would be more
useful to Germany in 1942.
� �That would be more true in 1941 before the U.S. started war
production. In any event the Nazi boneheads that planned Barbarossa
seemed to not have a clue how big the Soviet Union was. The Soviets had
some of their factories operating east of the Urals before they even had
roofs. I guess no one told them about natural German superiority.
� �I wonder if the Nazis could have produced enough heavy bombers to do
the job anyway. Producing fighters was a big enough stress on raw
materials as it was.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Out of over 120,000 a/c built, the Germans produced roughly 29,000
535 Do-17Z
870 Ju-86
1076 Ju-188
1169 He-177
1905 Do-217
7450 He-111
14980 Ju-88 (second only to the B-24 in WW2)
= 27985
Ar-234 230
Do-19 2
Do-23 210
Do-215 101
Do-317 3
Fw-200 276
He-274 2
He-277: 3
Ju-89 2
Ju-287 2
Ju-288 22
Ju-388 20
Ju-488 2
= 875
Grand total= 28,860
Rand McNally Encyclopedia of Military Aircraft
Without the V-Waffen programs there could easily have been built a few
more tens of thousands of bombers. More likely jet fighters though,
given the circumstances from 1943-forward.
Rob
1943 was too late, your side was losing ground and fighting a
defensive war. None of the airplanes you listed were long range heavy
bombers that could be built in quantity in 1039 or 1940. Darn the luck,
you needed B-17, B-24 or Lancasters. You also needed long range escort
fighters.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Keith Willshaw
2010-05-14 08:18:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob Arndt
Post by David E. Powell
Post by Rob Arndt
Thank you David for that practically useless information on the Me-264
history.
Well, it was a bit more info than just a picture, and if anyone was
interested in the plane, a nice place to start.
Post by Rob Arndt
As "Amerika Bomber" that would have been the Me-264B model that was
never built- you know, the 6-engine version which later evolved into
In my opinion a plane to hit factories beyond the Urals would be more
useful to Germany in 1942.
� �That would be more true in 1941 before the U.S. started war
production. In any event the Nazi boneheads that planned Barbarossa
seemed to not have a clue how big the Soviet Union was. The Soviets had
some of their factories operating east of the Urals before they even had
roofs. I guess no one told them about natural German superiority.
� �I wonder if the Nazis could have produced enough heavy bombers to do
the job anyway. Producing fighters was a big enough stress on raw
materials as it was.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Out of over 120,000 a/c built, the Germans produced roughly 29,000
535 Do-17Z
870 Ju-86
1076 Ju-188
1169 He-177
1905 Do-217
7450 He-111
14980 Ju-88 (second only to the B-24 in WW2)
= 27985
Ar-234 230
Do-19 2
Do-23 210
Do-215 101
Do-317 3
Fw-200 276
He-274 2
He-277: 3
Ju-89 2
Ju-287 2
Ju-288 22
Ju-388 20
Ju-488 2
= 875
Grand total= 28,860
While the Allies built 153,000 including

Halifax - 6,000
Lancaster - 7,377
Wellington - 11,461
Mosquito - 7,700

Note Britain alone outbuilt Germany

B-17 12,700
B-24 18,000
B-29 3,898
B-25 9,884
B-26 5,266
A-26 2,000

Start looking at heavy bombers and its even more striking

Germany approx 1,200
Western Allies 50,000 +
Post by Rob Arndt
Rand McNally Encyclopedia of Military Aircraft
Without the V-Waffen programs there could easily have been built a few
more tens of thousands of bombers. More likely jet fighters though,
given the circumstances from 1943-forward.
At a period when Britain and the USA were also producing large
numbers of jet fighters. Germany was well behind the production/loss
curve and was out of fuel and pilots for the aircraft it had. The
allies had both, this is a recipe for losing a war.

Keith
Dan
2010-05-14 09:07:56 UTC
Permalink
Keith Willshaw wrote:
<snip>
Post by Keith Willshaw
At a period when Britain and the USA were also producing large
numbers of jet fighters. Germany was well behind the production/loss
curve and was out of fuel and pilots for the aircraft it had. The
allies had both, this is a recipe for losing a war.
Keith
Or, more precisely, winning a war.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Rob Arndt
2010-05-14 10:25:30 UTC
Permalink
On May 14, 1:18�am, "Keith Willshaw"
Post by Keith Willshaw
Post by Rob Arndt
Post by Dan
Post by David E. Powell
Post by Rob Arndt
Thank you David for that practically useless information on the Me-264
history.
Well, it was a bit more info than just a picture, and if anyone was
interested in the plane, a nice place to start.
Post by Rob Arndt
As "Amerika Bomber" that would have been the Me-264B model that was
never built- you know, the 6-engine version which later evolved into
In my opinion a plane to hit factories beyond the Urals would be more
useful to Germany in 1942.
That would be more true in 1941 before the U.S. started war
production. In any event the Nazi boneheads that planned Barbarossa
seemed to not have a clue how big the Soviet Union was. The Soviets had
some of their factories operating east of the Urals before they even had
roofs. I guess no one told them about natural German superiority.
I wonder if the Nazis could have produced enough heavy bombers to do
the job anyway. Producing fighters was a big enough stress on raw
materials as it was.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Out of over 120,000 a/c built, the Germans produced roughly 29,000
�535 Do-17Z
�870 Ju-86
1076 Ju-188
1169 He-177
1905 Do-217
7450 He-111
14980 Ju-88 (second only to the B-24 in WW2)
= 27985
Ar-234 230
Do-19 2
Do-23 210
Do-215 101
Do-317 3
Fw-200 276
He-274 2
He-277: 3
Ju-89 2
Ju-287 2
Ju-288 22
Ju-388 20
Ju-488 2
= 875
Grand total= 28,860
While the Allies built 153,000 including
Halifax - 6,000
Lancaster - 7,377
Wellington - 11,461
Mosquito - 7,700
Note Britain alone outbuilt Germany
Not by much, just a few thousand. So what?
Post by Keith Willshaw
B-17 12,700
B-24 18,000
B-29 3,898
B-25 9,884
B-26 5,266
A-26 2,000
Start looking at heavy bombers and its even more striking
Germany approx 1,200
Western Allies 50,000 +
US was never strategically bombed and had far more resources than
Germany, yet produced no cruise missiles or BMs in WW2 while Germany
produced:

V-1: 34,000
V-2: 6,000
= 40,000
Post by Keith Willshaw
Post by Rob Arndt
Rand McNally Encyclopedia of Military Aircraft
Without the V-Waffen programs there could easily have been built a few
more tens of thousands of bombers. More likely jet fighters though,
given the circumstances from 1943-forward.
At a period when Britain and the USA were also producing large
numbers of jet fighters. Germany was well behind the production/loss
curve and was out of fuel and pilots for the aircraft it had. The
allies had both, this is a recipe for losing a war.
Keith- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
What Allied jet fighters are you talking about? Britain produced how
many Meteors in WW2 prior to VE-Day? The USAAF only sent 4 YP-80s to
Europe of which 2 crashed and the VVS had no jet aircraft operational.

I'm sure you will try to claim 3875 Meteors which covers its entire
history with all Mks but in WW2 it was just Mks I-III with 210 Mk.IIIs
produced from 44-47 (postwar included). Initial order for the Meteor
in WW2 was 120 a/c then upped to 300. I do not think you even made 300
by VE-Day. Same for the P-80A- 1000 ordered, but how many completed by
VE-Day?

German actual numbers:

Germany:

Ar-234 Blitz: 230
He-162: 250 +1000 under construction in May 1945
Me-163: 370
Me-262: 1433 + 400 under construction in May 1945
=2283+ 1400+ in reserves

Minor jet/rocket types:

Ba-349: 36
DFS-228: 2
DFS-346: 1
Fi Reichenberg R.I-IV: 175
He-176: 1
He-178: 2
He-280: 8
Ho-IX: 2
Hs-132: 1
Ju-287: 2
Lp DM-1: 1
Me-263: 2
Me-328: 5 + 50 under construction
Me P.1101: 1
= 239 + 50

Component manufacture:

Fw Ta 183: 1
He-343: 1
Ho XVIII: 1

Grand total= 2522 + 1450 + 3

Kills:

Me-262: 785
Me-163: 9-14
He-162 2-4

Total= 796-814

Allied jet kills= 0
Meteor V-1 kills= 14 (pathetic compared top piston-engined a/c)

Keith, what are you smoking???

Rob
Jim Wilkins
2010-05-14 11:21:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob Arndt
...
Post by Rob Arndt
7450 He-111
14980 Ju-88 (second only to the B-24 in WW2)
Ar-234 230
...
US was never strategically bombed and had far more resources than
Germany, yet produced no cruise missiles or BMs in WW2 while Germany
V-1: 34,000
V-2:   6,000
= 40,000
.........................

Thank you for admitting that the Vergeltungswaffen hurt Germany far
more than England.

"Without the V-Waffen programs there could easily have been built a
few
more tens of thousands of bombers."

ALL of which were "lesser" compared to the Allied heavies.

Instead of missiles we didn't need because we could bomb any target
freely, Allied production of freighters and landing craft was vastly
superior to Germany's pathetic canal-boat effort. They may not have
been Wunderwaffen but they delivered the troops that overran the
Heimat. No Axis power had even a tenth of our amphibious landing
capability, which was the key to flying our flag over their cities.

jsw
Geoffrey Sinclair
2010-05-14 13:51:56 UTC
Permalink
On May 14, 1:18?am, "Keith Willshaw"
Post by Keith Willshaw
Post by Rob Arndt
Out of over 120,000 a/c built, the Germans produced roughly 29,000
535 Do-17Z
870 Ju-86
1076 Ju-188
1169 He-177
1905 Do-217
7450 He-111
14980 Ju-88 (second only to the B-24 in WW2)
= 27985
Ah yes, count all the Ju88 built as bombers, ignore the substantial
fighter numbers, the C and G models, (around 3,900) also the
reconnaissance models. Similar for the Ju188 and Do217.

So we are counting all He111 production, from 1936 onwards.
Similar for the Ju86, but from 1935.
Post by Keith Willshaw
Post by Rob Arndt
Ar-234 230
Do-19 2
1 built.
Post by Keith Willshaw
Post by Rob Arndt
Do-23 210
Over 100 built for the Luftwaffe.
Post by Keith Willshaw
Post by Rob Arndt
Do-215 101
Do-317 3
Fw-200 276
He-274 2
He-277: 3
Ju-89 2
Ju-287 2
Ju-288 22
Ju-388 20
Ju-488 2
Well the Do23 were built 1934 to 1936

It would seem the idea is to drag anything that has a name, like the
Ju488 entry is for the two prototypes that were ordered, neither
was completed.
Post by Keith Willshaw
Post by Rob Arndt
= 875
Grand total= 28,860
The grand total includes prototypes, one offs, fighters, reconnaissance
versions, aircraft built as early as 1934 and aircraft never built.
Post by Keith Willshaw
While the Allies built 153,000 including
Halifax - 6,000
Lancaster - 7,377
Wellington - 11,461
Mosquito - 7,700
The Mosquito total includes the fighter and reconnaissance versions,
they need to be removed.

When you add the Whitleys, given the Fw200 above, plus
the Hampdens, the Blenheims and so on the British bomber
production 1939 to June 1945 comes to around 34,600
(Light bomber production is reported under fighters from
1944 onwards so I had to estimate the relevant production,
basically the Mosquito production)
Post by Keith Willshaw
Note Britain alone outbuilt Germany
Not by much, just a few thousand. So what?
You see if the Germans come second it does not matter, well
actually it does hence the way Robert counts the bombers.

The USSBS totals for multi engined German bombers comes
to 27,500 from 1939 to the end of 1944, but that counts all
Ju88 and Do217 etc. as fighters.

The German twin and 4 engined bomber production was
around 18,500 September 1939 to 1945, British production
comes to around 33,400

Actually compare like with like and it approaches 1.8 to 1
during the war.
Post by Keith Willshaw
B-17 12,700
B-24 18,000
B-29 3,898
B-25 9,884
B-26 5,266
A-26 2,000
Start looking at heavy bombers and its even more striking
Germany approx 1,200
Western Allies 50,000 +
US was never strategically bombed and had far more resources than
Germany, yet produced no cruise missiles or BMs in WW2 while Germany
V-1: 34,000
V-2: 6,000
= 40,000
Yes folks, Robert cannot handle the situation so time to simply ignore
what does not fit.

By the way add the B-34, A-20, A-28, 29, 30, B-32 and
Maryland you add over another 10,000 multi engined bombers,
between 1940 and August 1945.

Also Robert, since someone has mentioned it, the US alone built
over 46,000 landing craft, ranging between 4,570 and 6.4 tons.
Post by Keith Willshaw
Post by Rob Arndt
Rand McNally Encyclopedia of Military Aircraft
Without the V-Waffen programs there could easily have been built a few
more tens of thousands of bombers. More likely jet fighters though,
given the circumstances from 1943-forward.
I really like this, apparently the V-1 and V-2 were about as
expensive as a single engined fighter, plus of course a large
number of jet engines.

What a waste the V-1 was then.
Post by Keith Willshaw
At a period when Britain and the USA were also producing large
numbers of jet fighters. Germany was well behind the production/loss
curve and was out of fuel and pilots for the aircraft it had. The
allies had both, this is a recipe for losing a war.
What Allied jet fighters are you talking about?
Meteor, Vampire (just), P-59, P-80 were in production.

Other types were under development. The usual development
cycle, but slowing as the end of the war was in sight.
Britain produced how
many Meteors in WW2 prior to VE-Day?
About 70 all up.
The USAAF only sent 4 YP-80s to
Europe of which 2 crashed and the VVS had no jet aircraft operational.
Yet I note below what counts for Germany is anything whether it
flew or not, as long as it was given a name. The Soviets were doing
work on gas turbines.
I'm sure you will try to claim 3875 Meteors which covers its entire
history with all Mks but in WW2 it was just Mks I-III with 210 Mk.IIIs
produced from 44-47 (postwar included).
Robert thinks others will do what he does.

Gloster report building 8 F9/40, the prototypes, then 30 Meteors in
1944, 169 in 1945, 96 in 1946 and 114 in 1947, that comes to 409
plus the prototypes.

There were 20 mark I and 210 mark III, then 658 mark IV, so you can
work out when the mark IV started production.
Initial order for the Meteor
in WW2 was 120 a/c then upped to 300. I do not think you even made 300
by VE-Day. Same for the P-80A- 1000 ordered, but how many completed by
VE-Day?
Around 15.
Ar-234 Blitz: 230
He-162: 250 +1000 under construction in May 1945
Me-163: 370
Me-262: 1433 + 400 under construction in May 1945
=2283+ 1400+ in reserves
Yes folks aircraft not built count as reserves.

Also if you read the reports the quality control the above
totals do not represent aircraft able to fly properly.
Ba-349: 36
DFS-228: 2
DFS-346: 1
Fi Reichenberg R.I-IV: 175
He-176: 1
He-178: 2
Yes folks, even the one off proof of concepts are counting,
note Robert does not mention the P-59 nor the Vampire but
does count things like the above for the Germans.
He-280: 8
Ho-IX: 2
Hs-132: 1
Ju-287: 2
So the unflown Ju287V2 counts.
Lp DM-1: 1
Me-263: 2
Me-328: 5 + 50 under construction
Me P.1101: 1
= 239 + 50
It appears as long as a component was being designed the aircraft
counts. You know the P/F-84 should count for example.

I have not gone completely through the above lists but I think the
failure to count things properly is clear enough.

Of course Robert thinks counting allied types under
construction is a bad thing.
Fw Ta 183: 1
He-343: 1
Ho XVIII: 1
Grand total= 2522 + 1450 + 3
Yes folks if even a part is produced it counts as a completed
aircraft.

It is really quite funny to see this, the Germans produced
more jets but that is not enough, the numbers have to be
inflated and anything else that can be thought of has to be
added to the list.

The Germans deserve better.
Me-262: 785
Try around 200, similar downgrade for the other types.
Me-163: 9-14
He-162 2-4
Total= 796-814
No to put it mildly, it would mean for example none of the
piston engined fighters scored a kill in the west for the final 6
or so months of WWII.
Allied jet kills= 0
Meteor V-1 kills= 14 (pathetic compared top piston-engined a/c)
Now why is that a surprise given the numbers of each type
deployed. Cull and Lander in their book Diver! Diver! Diver! say
the Meteors shot down 12 V-1.

Geoffrey Sinclair
Remove the nb for email.
Keith Willshaw
2010-05-14 08:05:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by David E. Powell
Post by Rob Arndt
Thank you David for that practically useless information on the Me-264
history.
Well, it was a bit more info than just a picture, and if anyone was
interested in the plane, a nice place to start.
Post by Rob Arndt
As "Amerika Bomber" that would have been the Me-264B model that was
never built- you know, the 6-engine version which later evolved into
In my opinion a plane to hit factories beyond the Urals would be more
useful to Germany in 1942.
Only if you can build it in sufficient numbers. Given the record of the
US and British bombing campaigns against Germany you would
need to produce thousands of 4 engined bombers to make a
useful contribution. Germany was operating at the limit of its
industrial and manpower reserves as it was, They simply didnt
have the capacity to do so.

Keith
vaughn
2010-05-14 12:08:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob Arndt
Thank you David for that practically useless information on the Me-264
history.
"Useless" rob? Let me describe a "useless" post to you. It would be a post of
a single picture of some airplane, devoid of any text, that has been stolen from
somewhere on the Internet and therefore separated from any useable context. Do
you know anybody who makes hundreds of posts like that rob?

Vaughn
Geoffrey Sinclair
2010-05-14 13:52:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob Arndt
Thank you David for that practically useless information on the Me-264
history.
It was better than just a picture.

He indicated where the information came from.
Post by Rob Arndt
As "Amerika Bomber" that would have been the Me-264B model that was
never built- you know, the 6-engine version which later evolved into
the Me-264/6m... aka, Me-364..
Actually no, the original idea was the 4 engined version but that
proved inadequate.

We can start with the Me261 Adolfine, the ultra long range special
aircraft to fly the Olympic torch from Berlin to Tokyo direct. Proposed
to Hitler in 1936, who liked it, hence the name. Used the DB606, same
as the He177. First prototype first flew on 23 December 1940, the
third joined the test program in early 1943, it used the DB610, again the
same as the He177, it did a 10 hour flight on 16 April 1943 covering
2,796 miles. The V3 served in the Reconnaissance unit of the Luftwaffe
command, Aufkl.Gr.Ob.d.L, it had a crew of 7 a range of 6,830 miles
and a top speed of 385 mph. Span 88 feet 1.75 inches, length 54 feet
9.25 inches. It was largely a flying fuel tank, an attempt to fit defensive
armament was abandoned because of the cost in terms of range.
Post by Rob Arndt
The Me-264 from inception* was to be part of the America Mission that
was under Udet until his suicide in Nov 1941 which put Milch in
charge, afterwhich the first conference on the America Mission was
brought up in Feb 1942.
The Me264 started life as a private venture by Messerschmitt in 1940,
undoubtedly drawing on ideas from the Me261, but it was a much larger
aircraft, span 127 feet 7.5 inches, length 68 feet 7 inches, four 1,340 HP
Jumo 211J engines. The official go ahead seems to have been given in
1941 but it was a low priority project.

And it was aimed at America from the start, though clearly it was a
long range aircraft and could be used in other roles.
Post by Rob Arndt
It was Flugbaumeister Freibel (the air staff
engineer responsible for a/c development) that had stated that NONE of
the machines under development would have the capability of carrying
out that mission w/o development of air-to-air refueling.
So the Ta400, Ju290 and Me264, one result was the Ju390.
Post by Rob Arndt
That
included the Me-264 which at that time was hampered by workshop limits
and transferred temporarily to Dornier where problems persisted. Then
joined Weserflug which wanted to transfer management of the project to
S Germany and that was rebuked. Thus, the Me-264 as bomber was running
way behind schedule in 1942.
The first prototype first flight was in December 1942.
Post by Rob Arndt
In April 1942 Milch therefore ordered a complete evaluation of all
long-distance bomber aircraft projects (gee David the Me-264 was at
this point still a bomber project with nothing to do with convoy
protection, aka Condor work).
Condors did not do convoy protection, and the reality is the Luftwaffe
needed a long range maritime as well, the aircraft could obviously do
long range reconnaissance.

The fact Messerschmitt sold the idea as an America bomber, then
switched to the maritime role to sell it is not really surprising.
Post by Rob Arndt
On April 24th Oberstleutnant Edgar
Petersen, head of the Rechlin a/c test center went to Messerschmitt,
Augsburg to document and confirm that the Me-264 prototype was 90%
complete.
If that was the case the final 10% was a real problem.
Post by Rob Arndt
The same day Messerschmitt himself presented his personal
study on Atlantic Operations and suggested (key-word) that the Me-264
also have a secondary purpose of spying on Allied convoys and be used
as a maritime AS platform using modern bombs and missiles under
development.
In other words it was realised the aircraft had other uses, especially
as the He177 was having problems, don't want to buy our aircraft
to bomb America, buy it to bomb ships on the way to and from America.
Post by Rob Arndt
Messerschmitt also issued a report that a 45 ton Me-264
would have a range of 13,000 km if fitted with 4x Jumo 211J engines or
14,000 km with 4x BMW 801 radials. The V-1 was looking good for a
first flight in Sept 42 followed by the V-2 and V-3 by winter.
This sounds like Messerchmitt's hopes.
Post by Rob Arndt
The RLM embraced Messerschmitt's projections because nuisance raids on
American cities would be of high propaganda value and morale boosters
to the German people. So Messerschmitt was allowed to step up the pace
of develoment accordingly.
Yet the first flight of the prototype took place 3 months later than
given in the above schedule.
Post by Rob Arndt
However, the Fw-200 Condor and the He-177
also remained on a list of a/c that could be modified for longer-
ranges to hit the US which was part of Udet's original proposal before
his suicide.
That would be a rather big stretch unless the missions were one way.
Post by Rob Arndt
The minimum requirement was 12,000 km (the distance from
Brest to NY and return). 3000 km was added as fuel and technical
reserves with a minimum of 3.5 ton bomb load plus normal armor and
defensive armament. But Fw and Junkers (which had a proposal as well)
could not keep the weights down and proposed huge 100+ ton bombers
which would need future engines that were not yet in production. Even
if the DB 603 X 6 were available, it would take 2 years of developemnt
to fly the first a/c and that didn't happen.
The Ju390 came in at 73 tons maximum weight. The Bv238 came in
at around 100 tons.

The original Messerschmitt proposal was a 4,000 pound bomb load,
near doubling the load would have an inevitable effect on range. In
addition the original idea was for no defensive armament.
Post by Rob Arndt
Messerschmitt was dealt another blow when it was discovered that his
projections would not be adequate to reach America and return- that he
hadn't the necessary reserves to return and in-flight German re-
fueling was not being developed to that degree (two a/c take-off to
the 3000 km point and then one refuels the other and turns back to
France).
Hence the modifications to the V2 prototype and the pitch for a
maritime role.
Post by Rob Arndt
So then Messerschmitt was ordered to lighten up the a/c with
a generic version submitted by the RLM technical center. This would
feature a normal non-presurized cockpit, proven engines in production,
and no bomb-aimer's position. It was thought that these measures would
allow under-capacity Messerschmitt to proceed faster and avoid
cancellation of the a/c altogether.
But it was not enough to give the required performance.
Post by Rob Arndt
Meanwhile two other a/c were being considered for the job- the Bv-238
and Ju-390 derived from the 290.
What happened to the Ta400?
Post by Rob Arndt
In response, Messerschmitt now had to plan for development of a 6-
engine version of the Me-264 which could meet the demand for 15,000 km
range, 5 ton bombload, and 4 tons of added armament and armor!
The wingspan was increased to 141 feet 1 inches. The expected result
was an empty weight of 51,500 pounds, loaded 100,400, overloaded,
123,600 pounds, speed with GM-1 351 mph, range 9,315 miles, 8 crew.
To obtain the necessary fuel supply only 30% of the tanks were self
sealing.

Fitting GM-1 lowered the bomb load to a maximum of 6,615 pounds,
3 metric tons.

The maximum range was around 9,315 miles or 15,000 km but that was
with zero bomb load.

Still 4 engines, 1,700 HP BMW801E
Post by Rob Arndt
But due
to a 2 km run for t/o this version would have to use a jettisonable
undercarriage to get into the air. The heavier a/c was eliminated for
the AS role as it could not dive bomb, but would also have to hit NY
at night as horizontal bomber. Defensive armament also became a
problem, so then the idea of using parasite a/c smaller than a Me Bf
109 came into the studies.
Apparently the Me328.
Post by Rob Arndt
This in turn led to a complete re-evaulation of trans-Atlantic long-
1. The 4-engined Me-264 will proceed with the fastest possible
solution for operations against the US.
2. The necessary mid-air refueling procedure will probably be worked
out in 1942.
3. For distances up to 10000 km, the Ju-390 is best (heavier loads,
better armament, parasite fighters).
4. Investigations with the object of achieving a return to and from
America without refueling (6-engined Me-264) will be stepped up.
That seems to have translated to jet engine ideas or engines dedicated
to supercharging. Not 6 piston engines on the wings.
Post by Rob Arndt
5. Use of the Ju-290 for distances up to 8000 km will be investigated
with a view to using the aircraft to refuel the 4-engine Me-264.
At this point
At this point? The project is already wandering as the technical
obstacles become obvious.
Post by Rob Arndt
we end-up with an endless cycle of revisions, more
competitors, Goering's ignorance of the entire Trans-Atlantic
missions, no air tankers developed from the Ju-290, and Doenitz's
influence with regard to protecting his U-boats in the N Atlantic,
which proposed using the Me-264 for unarmed recon or back to AS with
bombs and missiles. The parasite question also lingered on with
development of the Me-328 with multiple proposals that severely
complicated the entire Amerika Bomber program to the point of
uselessness in the critical 1942-44 timeframe.
The idea there would be an America bomber in 1942 is not going
to happen given these meetings were going on in early 1942, and
of course the first of the designs did not fly until the end of the year.
And it proved inadequate.

Similar for 1943, and then again for 1944, given the technical issues.
Post by Rob Arndt
The Me-264 itself was late and when evaluated by Baur was loaded with
a multitude of technical problems and aerodynamic problems (stability
and tail flutter). The only real solution for t/o was to use 6x RATO
units to reduce t/o length from 2.4 km down to 1.2 and to substitute
remote-controlled weapons for defense.
Six more things to go wrong.
Post by Rob Arndt
And yet Messerschmitt and
Dornier combined could never have met the target production required
of at least 30-40 bombers a month, not even back in 1942 before the
entire German aviation industry was under round-the-clock bombing.
Messerschmitt could only attempt 6/mo max and so support for the a/c
began to wane.
So even if the designs could work, they could not be produced.
Post by Rob Arndt
With the first Me-264 completed and flown by Dec 23, 1942 and again in
March 1943 serious problems arose with the undercarriage.
Messerschmitt and undercarriage problems seem to go together.
Post by Rob Arndt
The unarmed
V-2 was also completed, but bombed in 1944
Looks like the V-2 was bombed before it flew, and in late 1943,
at that stage it had no armament or operational equipment.
Post by Rob Arndt
as was the transferred V-1
(with radial engines fitted) on April 16, 1944; thus, the Me-264
program came to an end,
In June 1944 Karl-Otto Saur, head of the Jagerstab, wanted to go ahead
with the Me262 with the turbojet option.
Post by Rob Arndt
only to have the SS completely revise the
Amerika Bomber program in 1945 to hit NY with a single Wunderwaffe.
Under construction for the task were the He-274, Ju-488, and Ho XVIII
as well as Peenemunde's rocket craft from EMW, Sanger's study of the
Silbervogel still in progress at Lofer, Austria and a ton of projekt a/
c that in no way could be completed before May 1945. Aircraft also
considered were the Bv-222 and He-277 with Ju-390 diverted over to KG
200 and SS evacuation work.
Yet another project that seems more about keeping busy in case
the people are drafted to the front.
Post by Rob Arndt
1) Luftwaffe Over America, Manfried Griehl, 2004, ISBN 0-7607-8697-6
2) Bombers of the Luftwaffe, Joachim Dressel and Manfried Griehl,
1994, ISBN 1-85409-140-9
3) Luftwaffe Secret Projects: Strategic Bombers 1935-1945, Dieter
Herwig and Heinz Rode, pgs 41-44, 2000, ISBN 1-85780-092-3
This would include the jet versions powered by 6x Jumo 018s or 028
turboprops and also looks at pusher configurations as well as the
Me-364.
In other words lots of paper projects.
Post by Rob Arndt
* The Me-264 originated in March 1941 before the US was even in the
war but was still considered for a "nuisance bomber". Why do oyu think
it had a bomb bay to carry up to 5 tons of bombs? Or did you think
that was for leaflets???
Actually it was originated in 1940 as a private venture by Messerschmitt,
and was allowed to go ahead as part of the America bomber idea. The
trouble was the aircraft was not up to the task. Also the oxygen tanks
for the GM-1 system were stored in the bomb bay, reducing the bomb
load.
Post by Rob Arndt
You would think that David would have known that :)
You would have thought the private venture origins of the Me264
would have been reported.

Geoffrey Sinclair
Remove the nb for email.
Jim Wilkins
2010-05-14 17:31:06 UTC
Permalink
...
Lets compare the Me-264 to the corresponding American project, the
mighty B-36, designed to bomb Berlin from North America in case
England fell.

According to the standards used here it had a combat range of 6000
miles, a payload of 72,000 Lbs and a speed of 420 MPH at 50,000 feet.
Since 100 of them were ordered into production on 23 July 1943 it was
a WW2 bomber. Maximum range was 10,000 miles.

Maximum weight of an individual bomb was 43,600 Lbs for the T-12 or
42,000 Lbs for the Mark-17 H-bomb.

Developmental models had nuclear propulsion and carried their own
escort fighters.

jsw
Keith Willshaw
2010-05-14 17:44:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jim Wilkins
...
Lets compare the Me-264 to the corresponding American project, the
mighty B-36, designed to bomb Berlin from North America in case
England fell.
According to the standards used here it had a combat range of 6000
miles, a payload of 72,000 Lbs and a speed of 420 MPH at 50,000 feet.
Since 100 of them were ordered into production on 23 July 1943 it was
a WW2 bomber. Maximum range was 10,000 miles.
Maximum weight of an individual bomb was 43,600 Lbs for the T-12 or
42,000 Lbs for the Mark-17 H-bomb.
Developmental models had nuclear propulsion and carried their own
escort fighters.
jsw
While one B-36 was flown with a nuclear reactor on board it
did not have nuclear propulsion.

Keith
Jim Wilkins
2010-05-14 21:50:57 UTC
Permalink
On May 14, 1:44 pm, "Keith Willshaw"
Post by Keith Willshaw
...
While one B-36 was flown with a nuclear reactor on board it
did not have nuclear propulsion.
Keith
It easily could have, making it far more credible than these Amerika
Bomber claims.

jsw
David E. Powell
2010-05-14 18:48:44 UTC
Permalink
snip
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
Post by Rob Arndt
The Me-264 from inception* was to be part of the America Mission that
was under Udet until his suicide in Nov 1941 which put Milch in
charge, afterwhich the first conference on the America Mission was
brought up in Feb 1942.
The Me264 started life as a private venture by Messerschmitt in 1940,
undoubtedly drawing on ideas from the Me261, but it was a much larger
aircraft, span 127 feet 7.5 inches, length 68 feet 7 inches, four 1,340 HP
Jumo 211J engines.  The official go ahead seems to have been given in
1941 but it was a low priority project.
And it was aimed at America from the start, though clearly it was a
long range aircraft and could be used in other roles.
snip
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
Post by Rob Arndt
That
included the Me-264 which at that time was hampered by workshop limits
and transferred temporarily to Dornier where problems persisted. Then
joined Weserflug which wanted to transfer management of the project to
S Germany and that was rebuked. Thus, the Me-264 as bomber was running
way behind schedule in 1942.
The first prototype first flight was in December 1942.
Post by Rob Arndt
In April 1942 Milch therefore ordered a complete evaluation of all
long-distance bomber aircraft projects (gee David the Me-264 was at
this point still a bomber project with nothing to do with convoy
protection, aka Condor work).
Condors did not do convoy protection, and the reality is the Luftwaffe
needed a long range maritime as well, the aircraft could obviously do
long range reconnaissance.
The fact Messerschmitt sold the idea as an America bomber, then
switched to the maritime role to sell it is not really surprising.
This gets back to my point of the Urals being a more important need.

Germany couldn't consistently hit the US from bases in Europe in 1942,
but then again the US couldn't hit Berlin from U.S. land bases either.
U.S. bombers were based in the UK and later North Africa.

The Soviets were closer, had land routes to Germany, and a more
pressing need was hitting their factories.

The use of maritime planes to assist U-Boats was the correct course
for Germany, from their perspective in 1942. The U.S. could fly planes
over the Atlantic to England but they needed fuel, bombs and bullets
to attack Germany. The key to Germany was to prevent this by cutting
off the supply chain. They also, of course, needed to stifle British
industry to prevent them using British arms and to prevent British
night raids too.

There were two ways open to stifling British industry. One would be
bombing it, the other would be cutting off raw materials by, once
again, stopping transportation. After 1941, probably after 1940, the
first option of direct bombing was out. The second, however, remained
an option and became the focus, so maritime planes would fit that
pattern and be more usedul in that role.

For long range bombing of land targets, it would seem that Soviet
industry would be a target, as well as Soviet supply routes and
railroads.
Dan
2010-05-14 19:04:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by David E. Powell
snip
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
Post by Rob Arndt
The Me-264 from inception* was to be part of the America Mission that
was under Udet until his suicide in Nov 1941 which put Milch in
charge, afterwhich the first conference on the America Mission was
brought up in Feb 1942.
The Me264 started life as a private venture by Messerschmitt in 1940,
undoubtedly drawing on ideas from the Me261, but it was a much larger
aircraft, span 127 feet 7.5 inches, length 68 feet 7 inches, four 1,340 HP
Jumo 211J engines. The official go ahead seems to have been given in
1941 but it was a low priority project.
And it was aimed at America from the start, though clearly it was a
long range aircraft and could be used in other roles.
snip
Post by Geoffrey Sinclair
Post by Rob Arndt
That
included the Me-264 which at that time was hampered by workshop limits
and transferred temporarily to Dornier where problems persisted. Then
joined Weserflug which wanted to transfer management of the project to
S Germany and that was rebuked. Thus, the Me-264 as bomber was running
way behind schedule in 1942.
The first prototype first flight was in December 1942.
Post by Rob Arndt
In April 1942 Milch therefore ordered a complete evaluation of all
long-distance bomber aircraft projects (gee David the Me-264 was at
this point still a bomber project with nothing to do with convoy
protection, aka Condor work).
Condors did not do convoy protection, and the reality is the Luftwaffe
needed a long range maritime as well, the aircraft could obviously do
long range reconnaissance.
The fact Messerschmitt sold the idea as an America bomber, then
switched to the maritime role to sell it is not really surprising.
This gets back to my point of the Urals being a more important need.
Germany couldn't consistently hit the US from bases in Europe in 1942,
but then again the US couldn't hit Berlin from U.S. land bases either.
U.S. bombers were based in the UK and later North Africa.
The Soviets were closer, had land routes to Germany, and a more
pressing need was hitting their factories.
The use of maritime planes to assist U-Boats was the correct course
for Germany, from their perspective in 1942. The U.S. could fly planes
over the Atlantic to England but they needed fuel, bombs and bullets
to attack Germany. The key to Germany was to prevent this by cutting
off the supply chain. They also, of course, needed to stifle British
industry to prevent them using British arms and to prevent British
night raids too.
There were two ways open to stifling British industry. One would be
bombing it, the other would be cutting off raw materials by, once
again, stopping transportation. After 1941, probably after 1940, the
first option of direct bombing was out. The second, however, remained
an option and became the focus, so maritime planes would fit that
pattern and be more usedul in that role.
For long range bombing of land targets, it would seem that Soviet
industry would be a target, as well as Soviet supply routes and
railroads.
It would be simpler to say the Nazis started a war unprepared to win.
She should have learned from WW1.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Keith Willshaw
2010-05-14 19:20:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by David E. Powell
There were two ways open to stifling British industry. One would be
bombing it, the other would be cutting off raw materials by, once
again, stopping transportation. After 1941, probably after 1940, the
first option of direct bombing was out. The second, however, remained
an option and became the focus, so maritime planes would fit that
pattern and be more usedul in that role.
Which is why the Germans built the FW-200 and used He-111, Ju-88
and Ju-87 for maritime recon and attack.

Trouble is the RN and USN started building escort carriers and
long range fighters. The writing was on the wall for all to see
when 4 Fw-200's were shot down by F4 Martlet's (Wildcat)
from HMS Audacity over convoy OG 76 in Sept 1941
Post by David E. Powell
For long range bombing of land targets, it would seem that Soviet
industry would be a target, as well as Soviet supply routes and
railroads.
Why would you think they could make any significant dent in Soviet
war production which is scattered over a large area a LONG way
from German bases when they had essentially no effect on the
industries of the Tees or Tyne which are only 100 miles away and
concentrated around a river estuary ?

Keith
David E. Powell
2010-05-15 02:48:02 UTC
Permalink
On May 14, 3:20 pm, "Keith Willshaw"
Post by Keith Willshaw
Post by David E. Powell
There were two ways open to stifling British industry. One would be
bombing it, the other would be cutting off raw materials by, once
again, stopping transportation. After 1941, probably after 1940, the
first option of direct bombing was out. The second, however, remained
an option and became the focus, so maritime planes would fit that
pattern and be more usedul in that role.
Which is why the Germans built the FW-200 and used He-111, Ju-88
and Ju-87 for maritime recon and attack.
Yes, and Messerschmitt could thne promote their plane as a follow on
to the Condor.
Post by Keith Willshaw
Trouble is the RN and USN started building escort carriers and
long range fighters. The writing was on the wall for all to see
when  4 Fw-200's were shot down by F4 Martlet's (Wildcat)
from HMS Audacity over convoy  OG 76 in Sept 1941
True. They were thinking in terms of their early war experience,
though, and a patrol plane could be seen as more useful than a long
range "America bomber." The key was to hit the closest threat, and
that would mean cutting off the attacks from Britain and the supply
routes, which while they were becoming harder were seen as more
productive than hitting the continental US.
Post by Keith Willshaw
Post by David E. Powell
For long range bombing of land targets, it would seem that Soviet
industry would be a target, as well as Soviet supply routes and
railroads.
Why would you think they could make any significant dent in Soviet
war production which is scattered over a large area a LONG way
from German bases when they had essentially no effect on the
industries of the Tees or Tyne which are only 100 miles away and
concentrated around a river estuary ?
The time to build a force to do so would have to be earlier than 1942.
As Hitler had his eyes fixed on the USSR for a long time it would seem
something they could have considered earlier. As it was, hitting rail
routes and such could have been doable in 1941 but I am guessing that
their medium bombers were being tasked more to tactical roles. Though
Moscow was bombed on numerous occasions in 1941.
Post by Keith Willshaw
Keith
Rob Arndt
2010-05-15 03:46:22 UTC
Permalink
On May 14, 3:20�pm, "Keith Willshaw"
Post by Keith Willshaw
Post by David E. Powell
There were two ways open to stifling British industry. One would be
bombing it, the other would be cutting off raw materials by, once
again, stopping transportation. After 1941, probably after 1940, the
first option of direct bombing was out. The second, however, remained
an option and became the focus, so maritime planes would fit that
pattern and be more usedul in that role.
Which is why the Germans built the FW-200 and used He-111, Ju-88
and Ju-87 for maritime recon and attack.
Yes, and Messerschmitt could thne promote their plane as a follow on
to the Condor.
Post by Keith Willshaw
Trouble is the RN and USN started building escort carriers and
long range fighters. The writing was on the wall for all to see
when �4 Fw-200's were shot down by F4 Martlet's (Wildcat)
from HMS Audacity over convoy �OG 76 in Sept 1941
True. They were thinking in terms of their early war experience,
though, and a patrol plane could be seen as more useful than a long
range "America bomber." The key was to hit the closest threat, and
that would mean cutting off the attacks from Britain and the supply
routes, which while they were becoming harder were seen as more
productive than hitting the continental US.
Post by Keith Willshaw
Post by David E. Powell
For long range bombing of land targets, it would seem that Soviet
industry would be a target, as well as Soviet supply routes and
railroads.
Why would you think they could make any significant dent in Soviet
war production which is scattered over a large area a LONG way
from German bases when they had essentially no effect on the
industries of the Tees or Tyne which are only 100 miles away and
concentrated around a river estuary ?
The time to build a force to do so would have to be earlier than 1942.
As Hitler had his eyes fixed on the USSR for a long time it would seem
something they could have considered earlier. As it was, hitting rail
routes and such could have been doable in 1941 but I am guessing that
their medium bombers were being tasked more to tactical roles. Though
Moscow was bombed on numerous occasions in 1941.
Post by Keith Willshaw
Keith- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Wever died in 1936 and with him the Ural Bomber. Goering wanted medium
bombers, so Dornier, Heinkel, and Junkers were limited to what they
could propose. Focke-Wulf could adapt the Condor as an exception for
maritime use, but only Messerschmitt was the serious contender for the
America Mission profile and remained that way until both Versuchs
machines were bombed in 1944. After that the SS took over all of
Germany's top weapon systems and then revived the Amerika Bomber with
a different profile of dropping a single Wunderwaffe on NYC- return
trip or one-way. Spacecraft were also considered from EMW, a division
of Peenemunde for adapting the A-4 into a flight machine. But
regardless, time had run out.

And as far as Russia goes, the LW needed transports, fighters, and
strike a/c more than bombers to support the Heer. Besides, how many
big cities in Russia to bomb? The Germans only later figured out that
they could have bombed the USSR's electrical plants and shut down
production significantly (which the Allies also figured out with
Germany).

But then again one might argue that by splitting up the Army Groups
into 3 directions that Army Group Center was denied reaching Moscow in
time. Had they made a combined beeline for Moscow they would have
gotten there months earlier and the Soviet Govt would have collapsed.
Stalin was no MacArthur; in fact, his own people hated him so much
that many parts of the USSR greeted the Germans as liberators until it
became known that the Germans regarded all Slavs as sub-human vermin
to be exterminated or used for slave labor for the Reich.

Rob
Dan
2010-05-15 04:20:42 UTC
Permalink
Rob Arndt wrote:
<snip>
Post by Rob Arndt
But then again one might argue that by splitting up the Army Groups
into 3 directions that Army Group Center was denied reaching Moscow in
time. Had they made a combined beeline for Moscow they would have
gotten there months earlier and the Soviet Govt would have collapsed.
Probably not. The government is a body of people who could simply
vacate the premises. In case you missed it the Soviet Union was a rather
large piece of real estate. Taking capitols doesn't indicate a win. If
it did the British would have won the War of 1812, for example.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Rob Arndt
2010-05-15 06:09:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dan
<snip>
Post by Rob Arndt
But then again one might argue that by splitting up the Army Groups
into 3 directions that Army Group Center was denied reaching Moscow in
time. Had they made a combined beeline for Moscow they would have
gotten there months earlier and the Soviet Govt would have collapsed.
� �Probably not. The government is a body of people who could simply
vacate the premises. In case you missed it the Soviet Union was a rather
large piece of real estate. Taking capitols doesn't indicate a win. If
it did the British would have won the War of 1812, for example.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Yes, but fat chance of Stalin rallying all those Siberian divisions if
Moscow fell and he fled. Stalin probably would have been assassinated.
Too bad KG 200's mission to do that failed due to a crash and dry
clothing after wet weather!!!

Marshall Tito also barely got away from the SS Fallschirmjaeger
Battalion 500 by minutes even though that mission was a disaster
overall as the unit was partially penal and took heavy casualties.

Rob
Dan
2010-05-15 12:29:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob Arndt
Post by Dan
<snip>
Post by Rob Arndt
But then again one might argue that by splitting up the Army Groups
into 3 directions that Army Group Center was denied reaching Moscow in
time. Had they made a combined beeline for Moscow they would have
gotten there months earlier and the Soviet Govt would have collapsed.
� �Probably not. The government is a body of people who could simply
vacate the premises. In case you missed it the Soviet Union was a rather
large piece of real estate. Taking capitols doesn't indicate a win. If
it did the British would have won the War of 1812, for example.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Yes, but fat chance of Stalin rallying all those Siberian divisions if
Moscow fell and he fled. Stalin probably would have been assassinated.
Too bad KG 200's mission to do that failed due to a crash and dry
clothing after wet weather!!!
Let me see if I understand your position by restating it. The Nazis
invaded the Soviet Union. The murdered, raped, looted and destroyed
everywhere they went. They took huge tracts of land. You think Stalin
would be assassinated by his own people. Then what? The new government
would say "Hey, Nazi bastards, you win?"

The same Soviets who rallied behind Stalin once the Nazis invaded
would probably keep him in power. Despite the July 1944 bomb plot most
Germans supported Hitler until the end. Same idea.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Rob Arndt
2010-05-15 12:49:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob Arndt
Post by Dan
<snip>
Post by Rob Arndt
But then again one might argue that by splitting up the Army Groups
into 3 directions that Army Group Center was denied reaching Moscow in
time. Had they made a combined beeline for Moscow they would have
gotten there months earlier and the Soviet Govt would have collapsed.
Probably not. The government is a body of people who could simply
vacate the premises. In case you missed it the Soviet Union was a rather
large piece of real estate. Taking capitols doesn't indicate a win. If
it did the British would have won the War of 1812, for example.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Yes, but fat chance of Stalin rallying all those Siberian divisions if
Moscow fell and he fled. Stalin probably would have been assassinated.
Too bad KG 200's mission to do that failed due to a crash and dry
clothing after wet weather!!!
� �Let me see if I understand your position by restating it. The Nazis
invaded the Soviet Union. The murdered, raped, looted and destroyed
everywhere they went. They took huge tracts of land. You think Stalin
would be assassinated by his own people. Then what? The new government
would say "Hey, Nazi bastards, you win?"
� �The same Soviets who rallied behind Stalin once the Nazis invaded
would probably keep him in power. Despite the July 1944 bomb plot most
Germans supported Hitler until the end. Same idea.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Germans followed Hitler under Nazism freely while Stalin butchered his
own people and Generals. The avg Soviet soldier has a MG in his back
while he fought and political officers watching everywhere. Not the
same thing at all. In fact the Red Army made fun of the Siberian
soldiers, they were second class.

And the Lebensraum Hitler wanted was west of the Urals anyway.

If you think the Germans were going to live in Siberia you are out of
your mind. As for resources there was plenty of oil, industrial
facilities, and agriculture on the western side. I actually feel sorry
for all those Slav bastards that had their land destroyed 4 times
over: twice by their own Red Army to deny the Germans resources and
the battle to take back land and twice by the Germans to deny the Reds
resources and all of those battles in retreat. No wonder that the USSR
won but made over 2 million German soldiers march back to repair the
damage over 10 years and STILL a lot of the USSR is exactly as it was
back then with open land littered with German tanks and weapons as
well as Soviet and facilitites never repaired.

Rob
Jim Wilkins
2010-05-15 12:56:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob Arndt
...>
Germans followed Hitler under Nazism freely while Stalin butchered his
own people and Generals.
...
Rob
Even today Stalin still has supporters just as you remain an apologist
for the Nazis:
http://www.kyivpost.com/news/nation/detail/66005/

jsw
Dan
2010-05-15 13:09:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob Arndt
Post by Rob Arndt
Post by Dan
<snip>
Post by Rob Arndt
But then again one might argue that by splitting up the Army Groups
into 3 directions that Army Group Center was denied reaching Moscow in
time. Had they made a combined beeline for Moscow they would have
gotten there months earlier and the Soviet Govt would have collapsed.
Probably not. The government is a body of people who could simply
vacate the premises. In case you missed it the Soviet Union was a rather
large piece of real estate. Taking capitols doesn't indicate a win. If
it did the British would have won the War of 1812, for example.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Yes, but fat chance of Stalin rallying all those Siberian divisions if
Moscow fell and he fled. Stalin probably would have been assassinated.
Too bad KG 200's mission to do that failed due to a crash and dry
clothing after wet weather!!!
� �Let me see if I understand your position by restating it. The Nazis
invaded the Soviet Union. The murdered, raped, looted and destroyed
everywhere they went. They took huge tracts of land. You think Stalin
would be assassinated by his own people. Then what? The new government
would say "Hey, Nazi bastards, you win?"
� �The same Soviets who rallied behind Stalin once the Nazis invaded
would probably keep him in power. Despite the July 1944 bomb plot most
Germans supported Hitler until the end. Same idea.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Germans followed Hitler under Nazism freely while Stalin butchered his
own people and Generals. The avg Soviet soldier has a MG in his back
while he fought and political officers watching everywhere.
The Nazis never murdered their own officers and people? The Nazis
didn't have "political officers watching everywhere?" Are you in denial
or just lying again?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Keith Willshaw
2010-05-15 13:49:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob Arndt
Germans followed Hitler under Nazism freely
Actually only 1/3 voted for him and the main role of the Gestapo
was ensuring internal security in the Reich. The first people to
be sent to the concentration camps were of course German.
Post by Rob Arndt
while Stalin butchered his
own people and Generals. The avg Soviet soldier has a MG in his back
while he fought and political officers watching everywhere. Not the
same thing at all. In fact the Red Army made fun of the Siberian
soldiers, they were second class.
The Russians were not fighting for Hitler any more than they
had been fighting for the Tsar in 1812. They were fighting
against a brutal invader. Kill or depose Stalin and you get
Molotov or Khruschev in charge.
Post by Rob Arndt
And the Lebensraum Hitler wanted was west of the Urals anyway.
Which happens to be where most Russians live.
Post by Rob Arndt
If you think the Germans were going to live in Siberia you are out of
your mind. As for resources there was plenty of oil, industrial
facilities, and agriculture on the western side.
There was no oil on the western side. Then as now oil came
from Siberia and the oilfields of the Casoian sea area. This is why
in 1942 the German army tried to take it and came to grief
at Stalingrad
Post by Rob Arndt
I actually feel sorry
for all those Slav bastards that had their land destroyed 4 times
over: twice by their own Red Army to deny the Germans resources and
the battle to take back land and twice by the Germans to deny the Reds
resources and all of those battles in retreat. No wonder that the USSR
won but made over 2 million German soldiers march back to repair the
damage over 10 years and STILL a lot of the USSR is exactly as it was
back then with open land littered with German tanks and weapons as
well as Soviet and facilitites never repaired.
Here are some free clues for you Rob

1) The USSR ceased to exist almost 20 years ago

2) In 1975 I made my first visit to the USSR and while flying in to
Leningrad you could still see the shell craters around the edge
of the city the rebuilding was pretty much complete but some of
the great palaces were still empty shells.

3) In 1989 I made my last visit to the USSR and on going
to Leningrad saw that those palaces had now been refurbished
internally as well.

The only place you could see German tanks were in the military
museums and at the war memorials.

You should try looking at reality some time, its much more
fun than make believe.

Keith
tankfixer
2010-05-16 00:56:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Keith Willshaw
There was no oil on the western side. Then as now oil came
from Siberia and the oilfields of the Casoian sea area. This is why
in 1942 the German army tried to take it and came to grief
at Stalingrad
I'd say they started down the Caucasus to take it and some lunatic side
tracked the army to Stalingrad.
Keith Willshaw
2010-05-16 11:35:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by tankfixer
Post by Keith Willshaw
There was no oil on the western side. Then as now oil came
from Siberia and the oilfields of the Casoian sea area. This is why
in 1942 the German army tried to take it and came to grief
at Stalingrad
I'd say they started down the Caucasus to take it and some lunatic side
tracked the army to Stalingrad.
Actually the lunatic split the army and sent part of it to Stalingrad.
Stalingrad couldn't be ignored as it was a threat to the flank
but it could and should have been bypassed and guard force
left in place.

Keith
Jim Wilkins
2010-05-16 12:01:39 UTC
Permalink
On May 16, 7:35 am, "Keith Willshaw"
Post by Keith Willshaw
...
Actually the lunatic split the army and sent part of it to Stalingrad.
Stalingrad couldn't be ignored as it was a threat to the flank
but it could and should have been bypassed and guard force
left in place.
Keith
It was the collapse of the Italian guard force that let the Red Army
envelop Stalingrad. The Germans pulled back from Maikop because they
couldn't surround Stalingrad and prevent reinforcement.

jsw
Keith Willshaw
2010-05-16 13:19:25 UTC
Permalink
On May 16, 7:35 am, "Keith Willshaw"
Post by Keith Willshaw
...
Actually the lunatic split the army and sent part of it to Stalingrad.
Stalingrad couldn't be ignored as it was a threat to the flank
but it could and should have been bypassed and guard force
left in place.
Keith
It was the collapse of the Italian guard force that let the Red Army
envelop Stalingrad.
Not just Italians but Rumanians and Hungarians too. The German
high command knew that those units lacked the equipment needed
to take on Soviet front line divisions. Moreover the losses in
Stalingrad were so heavy that they continually transferred
forces from the flanks into the city to provide reinforcements.
The Germans pulled back from Maikop because they
couldn't surround Stalingrad and prevent reinforcement.
jsw
Indeed but given the choice of either pushing on and leaving
a guard force or launching an all out attack with the full force they
made the choice to divide the army ensuring they could take
neither Stalingrad nor the Caucasian oil fields.

The German army was superb in the battle of maneuver but
they threw away that advantage when they got themselves
bogged down in street fighting in the city.

As it was they lost not only sixth army in the city but came dammed
close to losing the armies in the Caucasus as well.

Keith
tankfixer
2010-05-16 15:51:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Keith Willshaw
Post by tankfixer
Post by Keith Willshaw
There was no oil on the western side. Then as now oil came
from Siberia and the oilfields of the Casoian sea area. This is why
in 1942 the German army tried to take it and came to grief
at Stalingrad
I'd say they started down the Caucasus to take it and some lunatic side
tracked the army to Stalingrad.
Actually the lunatic split the army and sent part of it to Stalingrad.
Stalingrad couldn't be ignored as it was a threat to the flank
but it could and should have been bypassed and guard force
left in place.
Keith
Thanks, that is a better description of the events.
Malcom "Mal" Reynolds
2010-05-16 07:18:48 UTC
Permalink
In article
<7db3aaa3-cfc3-43e7-a9ca-***@z1
5g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
Post by Rob Arndt
and STILL a lot of the USSR is exactly as it was
back then with open land littered with German tanks and weapons as
well as Soviet and facilitites never repaired.
If that were true, they would have a
rich export market for collectors
looking for museum pieces to restore
Keith Willshaw
2010-05-15 10:30:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob Arndt
But then again one might argue that by splitting up the Army Groups
into 3 directions that Army Group Center was denied reaching Moscow in
time. Had they made a combined beeline for Moscow they would have
gotten there months earlier and the Soviet Govt would have collapsed.
Napoleon thought the same thing in 1812, it didnt work then either.

Keith
Geoffrey Sinclair
2010-05-16 16:09:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob Arndt
Wever died in 1936 and with him the Ural Bomber. Goering wanted medium
bombers, so Dornier, Heinkel, and Junkers were limited to what they
could propose.
Not that simple, the economy was having enough trouble producing
the required numbers, plus the problems the requirements presented,
plus the results of the designs as flown, meant the cancellation. The
development effort transferred to things like the He177 and Ju288.

Also it made little sense to have a long range bomber force given the
number of countries Hitler expected to fight that had borders with
Germany.
Post by Rob Arndt
Focke-Wulf could adapt the Condor as an exception for
maritime use, but only Messerschmitt was the serious contender for the
America Mission profile and remained that way until both Versuchs
machines were bombed in 1944.
This ignores the Ju290 and 390 designs.
Post by Rob Arndt
After that the SS took over all of
Germany's top weapon systems and then revived the Amerika Bomber
with a different profile of dropping a single Wunderwaffe on NYC- return
trip or one-way. Spacecraft were also considered from EMW, a division
of Peenemunde for adapting the A-4 into a flight machine. But
regardless, time had run out.
Lack of wonder weapons was another problem.
Post by Rob Arndt
And as far as Russia goes, the LW needed transports, fighters, and
strike a/c more than bombers to support the Heer.
Actually no, the lighter types for front line and train busting certainly,
but heavy interdiction of rail lines required bombers. Remember the
doctrine was seal the battlefield off as well as support the troops.
The lack of German troops from 1942 onwards saw the seal the
battlefield sorties dropped as the Luftwaffe found it needed most of
its assets to do direct battlefield support. The lack of attacks away
from the front made things easier for the Soviets.

Also air transport is very expensive, a better use of the resources is
investing in rail transport capacity.
Post by Rob Arndt
Besides, how many
big cities in Russia to bomb?
I would have thought the industry supplying the Soviet forces would
be a good target.

And there were plenty of large cities in the USSR, Moscow was
smaller but comparable to Berlin, Leningrad similar versus
Hannover.
Post by Rob Arndt
The Germans only later figured out that
they could have bombed the USSR's electrical plants and shut down
production significantly (which the Allies also figured out with
Germany).
Having a bombing plan is one thing, the real world effects of bombing
is another. The normal result of the WWII bombing plans was more
effort was required than expected.

It seems standard the untried bombing plan was the best one.
Post by Rob Arndt
But then again one might argue that by splitting up the Army Groups
into 3 directions that Army Group Center was denied reaching Moscow
in time.
Only someone rather ignorant of military requirements would make
such a case. Army Group Centre ran out of supplies, more troops
do not make the supply situation better. Furthermore there are
real limits on the number of troops that can be deployed in a given
area.

The front north of the Pripets became significantly longer as you
move east, the forces clearing the Baltic coast covered the flank
of the forces heading for Moscow as well as opening up the
Baltic for supply ships, taking some of the strain off the rail lines.

The Soviet forces in the south were strong, had competent
command and were not very far from Ploesti and its oil.
Post by Rob Arndt
Had they made a combined beeline for Moscow they would have
gotten there months earlier and the Soviet Govt would have collapsed.
Lets see now, moving the historical time the German forces made it
to near Moscow by 3 months puts it at around the end of August 1941.
A time when the front line German forces were very short of supplies.

A reason Guderian struck south was that only one army in Army
Group Centre could be properly supplied at the time. The pause
ensured some supplies could be built up and forces could be
moved from around Leningrad to support the attack.

Stalin being deposed is one thing, the Soviet government collapsing
is another.

All German forces in Army Group centre simply ensures a greater
failure, not a bigger success.
Post by Rob Arndt
Stalin was no MacArthur; in fact, his own people hated him so much
that many parts of the USSR greeted the Germans as liberators until it
became known that the Germans regarded all Slavs as sub-human vermin
to be exterminated or used for slave labor for the Reich.
And the Nazi treatment was so bad the change of attitude did not
take very long.

Geoffrey Sinclair
Remove the nb for email.
Jim Wilkins
2010-05-15 11:54:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by David E. Powell
...
The time to build a force to do so would have to be earlier than 1942.
As Hitler had his eyes fixed on the USSR for a long time it would seem
something they could have considered earlier. As it was, hitting rail
routes and such could have been doable in 1941 but I am guessing that
their medium bombers were being tasked more to tactical roles. Though
Moscow was bombed on numerous occasions in 1941.
A crew on foot could repair tracks quickly once tool and supplies had
been distributed. I think the estimate for planning commando raids was
a four hour delay. If you've never seen it you would be amazed at what
a skilled crew can do with logs, rope and muscle.

http://140.194.76.129/publications/armytm/tm5-304/a-c.pdf

jsw
Keith Willshaw
2010-05-15 13:34:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jim Wilkins
Post by David E. Powell
...
The time to build a force to do so would have to be earlier than 1942.
As Hitler had his eyes fixed on the USSR for a long time it would seem
something they could have considered earlier. As it was, hitting rail
routes and such could have been doable in 1941 but I am guessing that
their medium bombers were being tasked more to tactical roles. Though
Moscow was bombed on numerous occasions in 1941.
A crew on foot could repair tracks quickly once tool and supplies had
been distributed. I think the estimate for planning commando raids was
a four hour delay. If you've never seen it you would be amazed at what
a skilled crew can do with logs, rope and muscle.
http://140.194.76.129/publications/armytm/tm5-304/a-c.pdf
The railway network around London was bombed heavily and the only
time delays were more than a few hours where when bridges and viaducts
were hit.

Keith
Paul J. Adam
2010-05-16 19:00:33 UTC
Permalink
In message
Post by Jim Wilkins
A crew on foot could repair tracks quickly once tool and supplies had
been distributed. I think the estimate for planning commando raids was
a four hour delay. If you've never seen it you would be amazed at what
a skilled crew can do with logs, rope and muscle.
Good example is the UN effort to cut North Korean rail communications.
--
He thinks too much, such men are dangerous.

Paul J. Adam
tankfixer
2010-05-15 01:36:39 UTC
Permalink
In article <3b8f4470-2590-446d-b5c6-40ff67fb4019
@t15g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>, ***@msn.com says...
Post by David E. Powell
Germany couldn't consistently hit the US from bases in Europe in 1942,
but then again the US couldn't hit Berlin from U.S. land bases either.
However the requirement was recognized and the aircraft to do so in
development..
The B-36..
Ken S. Tucker
2010-05-13 20:26:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rob Arndt
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a174/Tireur/amerikabomber_01.jpg
Rob
Looks like a copy of the Mighty Soviet Tu-4, that Americano's also
copied to make their B-29's.
Ken
Keith Willshaw
2010-05-13 21:24:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ken S. Tucker
Post by Rob Arndt
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a174/Tireur/amerikabomber_01.jpg
Rob
Looks like a copy of the Mighty Soviet Tu-4, that Americano's also
copied to make their B-29's.
Ken
So when Boeing invent the Time Machine ?

Keith
Jim Wilkins
2010-05-13 21:33:39 UTC
Permalink
On May 13, 5:24 pm, "Keith Willshaw"
Post by Keith Willshaw
Post by Ken S. Tucker
Looks like a copy of the Mighty Soviet Tu-4, that Americano's also
copied to make their B-29's.
Ken
So when Boeing invent the Time Machine ?
Keith
2037, not that it matters.
Ken S. Tucker
2010-05-13 21:41:54 UTC
Permalink
On May 13, 2:24 pm, "Keith Willshaw"
Post by Keith Willshaw
Post by Ken S. Tucker
Post by Rob Arndt
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a174/Tireur/amerikabomber_01.jpg
Rob
Looks like a copy of the Mighty Soviet Tu-4, that Americano's also
copied to make their B-29's.
Ken
So when Boeing invent the Time Machine ?
Keith
Americano's copied Mighty Soviet Buran, called it Shuttle, and Britos
copied
Mighty Soviet Tu-144 to make a little slow Concorde.
Soviets leaked plans for the Double Big Whopper, now Americano's are
all
fatso's.
Ken
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...